D.Sumathi v. Arumugham
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging violation of a 2015 order. Counsel submitted compliance. Court closed the petition with no costs.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed with no costs.
What the court decided
Cont.P.No.432 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.03.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Contempt Petition No.432 of 2016
D.Sumathi .. Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Arumugham, The Assistant Engineer, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, Chindadripet, Chennai – 2. .. Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed Under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for contempt of court for having violated deliberately and wantonly the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 15.06.2015 and made in W.P.No.16352/15.
For Petitioner : Mr.Syed Aejaz For Mrs.I.Kowser Nissar For Respondent : Mr.Jerry V.V.Sundar
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.Sumathi
- respondent
Mr.Arumugham
Coram
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court