K.Jayachandran v. S.Rajeswari and 3 others
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a 2022 High Court order regarding retirement benefits, the respondent Revenue Divisional Officer consented to settle benefits within three months. Consequently, the Court closed the contempt proceedings without adjudication.
What did the court decide?
No adjudication required; contempt proceedings closed without costs.
What the court decided
CONT.P.No.402 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.06.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
CONT.P.No.402 of 2023
in
W.P.No.33036 of 2015
K.Jayachandran
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Ms.S.Rajeswari, Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri District.
- 2.Dr.V.Jaya Chandra Bhanu Reddy, I.A.S., District Collector, Krishnagiri District.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition returns to the Court after the respondent assented to the petitioner's retirement and settlement of benefits.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Jayachandran
- respondent
Ms.S.Rajeswari, Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri District
- respondent
Dr.V.Jaya Chandra Bhanu Reddy, I.A.S., District Collector, Krishnagiri District
- respondent
Mr.S.K.Prabakar, IAS, Principal Commissioner & Commissioner of Revenue Administration
- respondent
Mr.Kumar Jayant, IAS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court