This contempt petition for disobeying a previous order was closed after the respondent produced proceedings showing a Special Officer was appointed, fulfilling the petitioner's request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Cont.P.No.37 of 2023
N.S.M.Ayuph Khan ... Petitioner
Vs.
Dr.D.Karthikeyan, IAS., The Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Higher Education, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.
.... Respondents
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for his willful disobedience of the order of this made in W.P.No.19506 of 2020 dated 14.09.2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Abu Backer Sidhic For Respondent : Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru Special Government Pleader
ORDER
This contempt petition is filed to punish the respondent for his willful disobedience of the order of this made in W.P.No.19506 of 2020 dated
14.09.2021. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2
N.ANAND VENKATESH.,J
ssr
2.When the contempt petition was taken up for hearing today, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents produced the proceedings of the respondent in G.O.(D) No.172 Higher Education (E1) Department, dated 01.06.2023. On going through the same, it is seen that the request made by the petitioner has been accepted and a Special Officer has been appointed.
3.Recording the same, this contempt petition is closed.
02.06.2023
Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No ssr
To
The Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Higher Education, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.
Cont.P.No.37 of 2023
N.S.M.Ayuph Khan
Dr.D.Karthikeyan, IAS.
N.ANAND VENKATESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
