V.Vinayabharathi v. Tmt.Mythili K.Rajendiran IAS and 2 others
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge bench closed a contempt petition for disobeying an order, granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue remedies subject to the outcome of a pending writ appeal filed before the Division Bench.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed with liberty to petitioner to workout remedies subject to outcome of writ appeal.
What the court decided
Cont.P.No.2860 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.01.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
Cont.P.No.2860 of 2022
V.Vinayabharathi
...Petitioner
Vs
1.Tmt.Mythili K.Rajendiran, I.A.S., The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George,
Chennai - 9.
2.Tmt.Umamageshwari, I.A.S., The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Frazer Bridge Road, Chennai - 3.
3.Dr.C.Munianathan,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to exercise jurisdiction to punish respondents for disobeying an impugned order when a writ appeal is pending.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Vinayabharathi
- respondent
Tmt.Mythili K.Rajendiran
- respondent
Tmt.Umamageshwari
- respondent
Dr.C.Munianathan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court