A. Revathy v. a. Ramu
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 for disobedience of a prior order. Counsel submitted the order was duly complied with. The Court closed the petition and awarded no costs.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed; no costs awarded to petitioner.
What the court decided
Cont.P.No.2423 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.03.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Cont.P.No.2423 of 2022
A.Revathy
... Petitioner
Vs.
Er.A.Ramu,M.E., Executive Engineer, Chennai South, Chennai Electricity Distribution Circle, MKN Road, Alandur, Chennai - 600 016.
... Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for wanton and willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.22723 of 2022 dated 01.09.2022.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order under challenge was duly complied with, thus warranting dismissal of the contempt petition.
Whether the contempt petition should be closed and no costs awarded upon recording of compliance submission.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Revathy
- respondent
Er.A.Ramu,M.E., Executive Engineer, Chennai South, Chennai Electricity Distribution Circle, MKN Road, Alandur, Chennai - 600 016.
Coram
Abdul Quddhose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court