Kuppayee v. Mrs.S.Banumathi
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed for willful disobedience of a Supreme Court order was closed as respondents surrendered possession and complied with the directive, admitting encroachment.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed as the direction of the court has been complied with.
What the court decided
Cont.P.No.2191/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30.01.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
Cont.P.No.2191/2022
Kuppayee .. Petitioner
Vs.
1.Mrs.S.Banumathi The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar Sangakiri Taluk Salem District. 2.M.Govindan 3.G.Vasanthakumar 4.G.Mohanraj .. Respondents **RR2 to 4 impleaded vide order dated 04.01.2023 in Sub.Appln.[OS] No.10/2023 in Cont.P.No.2191/2022
Prayer:- Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for having committed willful
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to punish respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed in WP.No.4664/2021.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kuppayee
- respondent
Mrs.S.Banumathi The Tahsildar
- respondent
M.Govindan
- respondent
G.Vasanthakumar
- respondent
G.Mohanraj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court