Disposed

Aalayam Power System P Ltd., v. Thiru. Rajesh Lakhoni I.A.S

Madras HC2 Mar 2023CONT P/1994/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras disposed of five Contempt Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act. The petitioners alleged contempt for disobeying an earlier order. The court found that counsel submitted the orders were duly complied with and closed the proceedings without punitive action.

What did the court decide?

The Contempt Petitions are closed with the court noting that the orders had been duly complied with and no punishment is imposed.

Aalayam Power System P Ltd., Vs Thiru. Rajesh… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.P. Nos.1994, 2077, 2122, 2311 and 2078 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 02.03.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

The HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

Contempt Petition Nos.1994, 2077, 2122, 2311 and 2078 of 2022

¶7

Contempt Petition No.1994 of 2022

¶8

Aalayam Power System P. Ltd. Rep. by its Director, S.V. Nallasivam

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

¶11

Thiru RajeshLakhoni, I.A.S. Chairman Cum Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., (TANGEDCO), 10th Floor, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

¶12

S. Surendiran The Chief Engineer, NCES, TANGEDCO, 2nd Floor, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/4

¶15

S. Viswanathan The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Udumalpet Electricity Distribution Circle, Udumalpet.

¶16

C.P. Nos.1994, 2077, 2122, 2311 and 2078 of 2022

¶17

K. Sundaravadhanam

¶18

Director Finance Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

¶19

... Respondents

¶20

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for their act of committing Contempt of Court by disobeying the order of this Court dated 20.06.2022 made in W.P. No.15292 of 2022.

¶21

For Petitioner in all Contempt Petitions : Mr.V. Purshothaman For Respondents in all Contempt Petitions : Mr.Jai Venkatesh

¶22

COMMON ORDER

¶23

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in these Contempt Petitions would submit on instructions that the orders passed

¶24

by this Court have been duly complied with and therefore, he is not pressing these contempt petitions.

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

2/4

¶27

C.P. Nos.1994, 2077, 2122, 2311 and 2078 of 2022

¶28

After recording the statement made by the learned counsel for

¶29

the petitioners that the orders passed by this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents, these Contempt Petitions are closed.

¶30

02.03.2023

¶31

Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No vsi2

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

3/4

¶34

C.P. Nos.1994, 2077, 2122, 2311 and 2078 of 2022

¶35

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

¶36

vsi2

¶37

Contempt Petition Nos.1994, 2077, 2122, 2311 and 2078 of 2022

¶38

02.03.2023

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

4/4

Aalayam Power System P Ltd., v. Thiru. Rajesh Lakhoni I.A.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aalayam Power System P Ltd., v. Thiru. Rajesh Lakhoni I.A.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Sri Gayathri Agencies Vs The State Tax officer (Circle)

M/s.Veerapandi Common Effluents Treatment Plant Limited Vs Assistant commissioner of State Taxes

M/s.Veerapandi Common Effluents Treatment Plant Limited Vs Assistant commissioner of State Taxes

M/s. Kawarlal and Co. Vs The State Tax officer

Tvl.Rukmani Thirupathi Egambavanan Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

Tvl.Rukmani Thirupathi Egambavanan Vs The State Tax Officer (Fac)