Disposed

T.Rajendran v. W.Rajendiran and another

Madras HC23 Nov 2023CONT P/1914/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge of the Madras High Court disposed of a contempt petition. The Additional Government Pleader submitted that the impugned order was complied with and the petitioner's representation was rejected. The court rejected the petition, granting liberty to challenge the rejection order.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to challenge the rejection order; contempt petition closed.

T.Rajendran Vs W.Rajendiran and another — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Cont.P. No.1914 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 23.11.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

Contempt Petition No.1914 of 2023

¶7

T.Rajendran .. Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

1.W.Rajendiran The Block Development Officer, Panjayat Union Ekkadu Thiruvallur District.

¶10

2.D.M.Thamilvanan

¶11

The President Pullarambakkam Village Panjayat, Thiruvallur Taluk and District. .. Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act 1971 to

¶13

punish the respondents for their willful and intentional disobedience to the order

¶14

of this Court in W.P.No.33119 of 2022 dated 09.12.2022.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Nagarajan

¶16

For Respondent : Mr.P.Gurunathan

¶17

Additional Government Pleader

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

1/4

¶20

Cont.P. No.1914 of 2023

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

This contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for their

¶23

willful and intentional disobedience to the order of this Court in W.P.No.33119 of 2022 dated 09.12.2022.

¶24

2.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents has submitted before this Court that the order which is the subject matter of this contempt petition has been complied with and the representation of the petitioner has been rejected.

¶25

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty of this Court for the petitioner to challenge the said order in the manner known to the petitioner under law.

¶26

4.Accordingly, this contempt petition is closed by granting liberty as

¶27

prayed for by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶28

23.11.2023

¶29

Index: Yes/No Speaking / Non speaking ssr

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

2/4

¶32

Cont.P. No.1914 of 2023

¶33

¶34

1.The Block Development Officer, Panjayat Union Ekkadu Thiruvallur District.

¶35

2.The President Pullarambakkam Village Panjayat, Thiruvallur Taluk and District.

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

3/4

¶38

Cont.P. No.1914 of 2023

¶39

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

¶40

ssr

¶41

Contempt Petition No.1914 of 2023

¶42

23.11.2023

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

4/4

T.Rajendran v. W.Rajendiran and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Rajendran v. W.Rajendiran and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Eicher Motors Ltd., Vs Nitin Services Point and Automobiles

M/S Apex Laboratories Pvt.Ltd., Vs M/S Elder Projects Limited

M/S Apex Laboratories Pvt.Ltd., Vs M/S Elder Projects Limited

M/s.Rasnam Foods Private Limited Vs Sangeeth Caterers and Consultants LLP

I.Keerthanan Vs Shri.Rajeev Verm IAS and another

M/S.Bhagwandass Metals and Steel Vs M/s.Sabari Alloys and Metals India Pvt. Ltd. and 2 others