Tmt.Santa v. Subramanian
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras recorded compliance with a prior order regarding possession in a contempt petition. The court closed the matter and directed the withdrawal of deposited rental amount.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to withdraw rental amount deposited to the credit of RCOP No.3 of 2000.
What the court decided
Contempt Petition No.181 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.04.2023
CORAM: JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
Contempt Petition No.181 of 2023
Tmt.Santha
... Petitioner
Vs.
Subramanian
... Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the undertaking and the consequent orders passed in CRP (NPD) No.1054 of 2007 dated 16.07.2013.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kamadevan For Respondent : Mr.P.Valliappan for M/s.P.V.Law Associates
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _________ Page 1 of 3_
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tmt.Santha
- respondent
Subramanian
Coram
N.Seshasayee
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court