Dismissed

P.Mathaiyan v. a.Shanmugasundaram IAS and 4 others

Madras HC15 Sept 2023CONT P/1376/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a non-speaking order closing a contempt petition filed for wilful disobedience of a prior court order. The court accepted the respondent's submission that no further documents would be relied upon and consequently dismissed the petition and connected sub-application.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition and connected sub-application were closed and dismissed.

P.Mathaiyan Vs a.Shanmugasundaram IAS and 4 others — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Cont P No.1376 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 15.09.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

Cont.P.No.1376 of 2023 and Sub.Appl.No.568 of 2023

P.Mathaiyan

... Petitioner

Vs.

A.Shanmugasundaram, IAS The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, No.170, N.V.Natarajan Maaligai, Periyar EVR High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-10.

¶11

S.Ramadoss,

¶12

The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Common Cadre Authority, Dharmapuri Region, Dharmapuri.

¶13

P.Anbazhagan

¶14

The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Dharmapuri Circle, Dharmapuri.

¶15

S.Muniyammal,

¶16

The President, K.K.41, Thumbalahalli Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society, Kendiganahalli Post, Karimangalam Taluk,

¶17

1/5

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/5

¶19

Cont P No.1376 of 2023

¶20

Dharmapuri District-635 205.

¶21

H.S.Palani, Co-operative Sub-Registrar/Field Officer/ Domestic Enquiry Officer, Dharmapuri. ... Respondents

¶22

Contempt Petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for the wilful disobedience of the order dated 09.02.2023 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.3590 of 2023.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sedhumadhavan, Mr.Kabilan

¶24

For Respondents : Mr.P.Sathish, Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.S.Ravikumar, for R4

¶25

ORDER

¶26

This Contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for

¶27

their wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.3590 of 2023 dated 09.02.2023.

¶28

Pursuant to the earlier order passed by this court, the documents

¶29

that are relied upon by the enquiry officer was furnished to the learned

¶30

counsel for the petitioner today.

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/5

¶32

Cont P No.1376 of 2023

¶33

The learned counsel for the 4th respondent submitted that apart from the documents that were furnished today, no other documents are going to be relied upon by the 4th respondent. Accordingly, this contempt petition is closed. Consequently, connected sub application is closed.

¶34

15.09.2023

¶35

Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non speaking order

¶36

nl/gvn

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5

¶38

Cont P No.1376 of 2023

¶39

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

¶40

nl/gvn

¶41

Cont.P.No.1376 of 2023 and Sub.Appl.No.568 of 2023

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5

¶43

Cont P No.1376 of 2023

¶44

15.09.2023

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5

P.Mathaiyan v. a.Shanmugasundaram IAS and 4 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Mathaiyan v. a.Shanmugasundaram IAS and 4 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Avina Paper and Boards Private Ltd. Vs v.C.R.Finance

Sethurajan Vs Manickavasagam

Johnybasha Vs Inspector of Police

S.Saranya Vs Pavankumar G.Giriyappanavar, Ias.

Selvakumar Vs the Deputy Superintendent of Police

M/S Tower Vision India Private Ltd. Vs the Superintendent of Police