S.Joseph Raj v. Shantanu Consul
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, the court observed that despite a direction to print the petitioner's name, there was no appearance from the petitioner on the date of hearing. Consequently, the court ordered the contempt petition to be closed without costs.
What did the court decide?
The Contempt Petition is closed with no costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.130 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.08.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA
Cont.P.No. 130 of 2010
S. Joseph Raj ... Petitioner
Vs.
- Shri. Shantanu Consul The Secretary to Government (Personnel), Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, New Delhi.
- Dr.V.K. Saraswat, The Scientific Adviser to Minister of Defence and Director General Research and Development, D.R.D.O.Bhavan, New Delhi.
3.Dr.G.Malakondaiah Director, Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, PO Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad - 500 058. ... Respondents
Page 1/4
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Joseph Raj
- respondent
Shri. Shantanu Consul
- respondent
Dr. V.K. Saraswat
- respondent
Dr. G. Malakondaiah
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court