A.Gunasekaran v. M.Ganasan Mba
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, counsel for both parties submitted that the underlying writ order has been complied with; the court accepted the submission and closed the petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.1254 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
Cont.P.No.1254 of 2023
A.Gunasekaran S/o.Arumugam 3/54B, Thirunagar Colony Kavere Veppampatti Post Thiruchengode Namakkal District
...Petitioner
Vs
- Thiru.M.Ganesan The Commissioner Thiruchengode Municipality Thiruchengode Namakkal District
- The Director Local Fund Audit Department Combined Audit Office Nanthanam Chennai – 600 035
...Respondents
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Gunasekaran
- respondent
Thiru.M.Ganesan
- respondent
The Director Local Fund Audit Department
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court