The High Court addressed a Contempt Petition filed for willful disobedience of a previous order. The court noted that the respondent had complied with the earlier order. The petitioner was directed to file a fresh application if needed, and the contempt petition was closed without any punishment.
Contempt Petition closed; Petitioner directed to apply afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT.P.NO.1096 OF 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.12.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
CONT.P.NO.1096 OF 2023
B.Murali Narasiman
.. Petitioner
Versus
Mr.Prathap, I.A.S., The Commissioner Coimbatore Corporation Office of the Corporation of Coimbatore Big Bazaar Road, Coimbatore – 1.
.. Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.463 of 2023 dated 09.02.2023.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Venkatesh For Respondent : Mr.J.Ravindran Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.N.Velmurugan Standing Counsel
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
CONT.P.NO.1096 OF 2023
O R D E R
TK
It is stated by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Corporation that the order dated 09.02.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.463 of 2023 has been complied with and the petitioner has to apply afresh.
2.Learned counsel for the petitioner also admits the same and submits that he would apply afresh within a week.
3.In view of the same, this Contempt Petition is closed.
01.12.2023
(1/2)
TK
CONT.P.NO.1096 OF 2023
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B.Murali Narasiman
Mr.Prathap, I.A.S.
N.Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
