The High Court dismissed the application as infunctuous solely because the applicant Company's status had been changed, without further reasoning. No legal proposition was articulated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Comp.A.No.83 of 2022 in C.P.No.14 of 2014
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.
Learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the status of the applicant Company has been changed and therefore, the prayer sought for in the present application has become infurctuous and hence, nothing survives in the present application for adjudication.
2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant, this application is dismissed as infructuous.
10.03.2023
rst
Company
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
