M/S Kaleesuwari Refinery Limited v. Ammi Samayal
Case brief
What is this about?
Defendant undertook not to use Plaintiff's trademark. Plaintiff accepted undertaking. Court closed suit without costs.
What did the court decide?
Suit closed against undertaking by defendant not to use Plaintiff's trademark. No costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.S. (COMM.DIV.) No.121 of 2023, O.A. Nos. 460 and 461 of 2023 and A. No.2740 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 16.10.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
C.S. (COMM.DIV.) No.121 of 2023, O.A. Nos. 460 and 461 of 2023 and A. No.2740 of 2023
M/s.Kaleesuwari Refinery Private Limited, represented by its Manager (Legal), A.Saravanan
.. Plaintiff
/versus/
Ammi Samayal
.. Defendant
Prayer: Civil Suit has been filed under Order IV, Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure read with Sections 134 and 135 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 to pass judgment and decree:
Coram
Abdul Quddhose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court