The High Court of Madras dismissed company appeals and a civil revision petition for non-prosecution, as the appellant failed to appear on the day of listing or on previous hearing dates.
Company Appeals Nos. 15 and 18 of 2010 and C.R.P. No. 2970 of 2010 dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Company Appeal Nos.15 and 18 of 2010 and C.R.P. No.2970 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.08.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Company Appeal Nos.15 and 18 of 2010 and C.R.P. No.2970 of 2010
Srinivasan Gokuldas ... Appellant in both Company Appeal Nos.15 and 18 of 2010
and
Petitioner in C.R.P. No.2970 of 2010
Versus
1.ARI Fabrics Limited, No.222A, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641 018.
2.S.Kalidasan
3.K.Karuakaran
4.S.K.Karthikeyan ... Respondents in Com.Apel. 5.R.Subramnaiyam No.15 of 2010
1.S.Kalidasan
1/4
Company Appeal Nos.15 and 18 of 2010 and C.R.P. No.2970 of 2010
2.K.Karuakaran
3.ARI Fabrics Limited, No.222A, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641 018. ... Respondents in Com.Apel. 4.S.K.Karthikeyan No.18 of 2010
1.S.K.Karthikeyan
2.S.Kalidasan
3.K.Karunakaran ... Respondents in C.R.P. No.2970 of 2010
Prayer in Com.Apel. Nos.15 and 18 of 2010: Company Appeals filed under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956 against the orders dated 29.04.2010 issued on 03.05.2009 and received on 04.05.2010 in C.P. Nos.13 and 29 of 2010 passed by the Company Law Board, Additional Principal Bench, Chennai.
Prayer in C.R.P. No.2970 of 2010: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order dated 03.08.2010 made in I.A. No.533 of 2010 in Arbitration O.P. No.114 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Coimbatore, dismissing the said petition and praying to set aside the same.
2/4
Company Appeal Nos.15 and 18 of 2010 and C.R.P. No.2970 of 2010
For appellant in both appeals and petitioner in : No appearance For respondents : No appearance
COMMON JUDGMENT
The matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, today. There is
no representation on the side of the appellant once again. Even on the last hearing date i.e. on 07.08.2023, there was no representation on the side of the appellant. The company appeals and the CRP are of the year 2010. It can now be inferred that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting these Company Appeals as well as the Civil Revision Petition. Accordingly, these company appeals as well as the Civil Revision Petition are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
21.08.2023
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order vsi2
3/4
Company Appeal Nos.15 and 18 of 2010 and C.R.P. No.2970 of 2010
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
vsi2
Company Appeal Nos.15 and 18 of 2010 and C.R.P. No.2970 of 2010
21.08.2023
4/4
Srinivasan Gokuldas
Srinivasan Gokuldas
ARI Fabrics Limited
S.Kalidasan
K.Karuakaran
S.K.Karthikeyan
Abdul Qaddafi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
