Allowed

Arivazhagan v. Chitra

Madras HC6 Nov 2023CMSA(MD)/43/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this matrimonial second appeal, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed the appeal based on a settlement reached through mediation. The appellant husband agreed to pay Rs. 6,50,000 to the respondent wife, which was fully paid. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the impugned order remained reversed, and the connected petition was closed with no costs.

What did the court decide?

Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal allowed. Connected miscellaneous petition closed. No order as to costs.

Arivazhagan Vs Chitra — Maintenance and Alimony | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.M.S.A.(MD)No.43 of 2010

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 06.11.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

C.M.S.A.(MD)No.43 of 2010

¶7

and

¶8

C.M.P.(MD)No.4339 of 2022

Arivazhagan

... Appellant

Vs.

1.Chitra

2.Gunaseelan

... Respondents

PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Order 43, Rule 1 and Section 104 of C.P.C., read with Section 100, against the Judgment and decree dated 19.03.2010 passed in C.M.A.No.22 of 2007 on the file of the District Court, Karur, reversing the Judgment and decree dated 14.02.2007 passed in H.M.O.P.No.60 of 2005 on the file of Sub Court, Karur.

¶16

For Appellant : Mr.S.S.Sundar For R-1 : Mr.S.Gokul Raj For R-2 : No appearance

¶17

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

C.M.S.A.(MD)No.43 of 2010

¶19

JUDGMENT

¶20

This Civil Miscellaneous Second appeal is filed, against the Judgment and decree dated 19.03.2010 passed in C.M.A.No.22 of 2007 on the file of the District Court, Karur, reversing the Judgment and decree dated 14.02.2007 passed in H.M.O.P.No.60 of 2005 on the file of Sub Court, Karur.

¶21

Heard, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, the learned Counsel appearing for 1^st respondent and perused the materials available on record.

¶22

In view of the Mediation which was held on 24.06.2022, the compromise has been arrived, between the appellant/husband and the 1^st respondent/wife. The appellant/husband agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 6,50,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs and Fifty Thousand only) and the 1^st respondent/wife agreed to receive the same. The 1^st respondent/wife received an amount of Rs.6,50,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs and Fifty Thousand only) from the appellant on 18.06.2022 towards permanent

¶23

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

C.M.S.A.(MD)No.43 of 2010

¶25

alimony. The appellant/husband agreed to withdraw the allegations leveled as against the respondents in the H.M.O.P and C.M.S.A. The Mediation Report will form a part and parcel of the Judgment and Decree of this CMSA.

¶26

4.In view of the above, this Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶27

06.11.2023

¶28

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Sml

¶29

To 1.The Principal District Judge, District Court, Karur.

¶30

2.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Karur. Copy to

¶31

The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶32

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

C.M.S.A.(MD)No.43 of 2010

¶34

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.,

¶35

Sml

¶36

C.M.S.A.(MD)No.43 of 2010

¶37

06.11.2023

¶38

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Arivazhagan v. Chitra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arivazhagan v. Chitra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N. Shanmugasundharam Vs Usharani

Kumaravel T Vs The Chief Secretary to Government

Siraiselvan.M Vs the Chief Educational Officer

Manimaran.a Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Shahila Begum.M Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Senguttuvan.S Vs the Principal Secretary to Government