The Court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal for non-prosecution as no representative appeared for the appellant on the hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.S.A.(MD)No.29 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 21.12.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
C.M.S.A.(MD)No.29 of 2017
and
C.M.P.(MD)No.9064 of 2017
Chitra @ Lakshmi ... Appellant
Vs.
G.Sivalingam @ Arunachalam ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Section 28 of Hindu Marriages Act, 1955, against the Judgment and decree dated 06.01.2017 in C.M.A.No.1 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Pudukkottai against the Judgment and decree dated 27.02.2015 in H.M.O.P.No.114 of 2012 on the file of the Sub - Court, Pudukkottai.
C.M.S.A.(MD)No.29 of 2017
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance
JUDGMENT
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 08.12.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today i.e., on 21.12.2023 under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
2.Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is dismissed for Non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
21.12.2023
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Sml
C.M.S.A.(MD)No.29 of 2017
To
Copy to
The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
C.M.S.A.(MD)No.29 of 2017
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.,
Sml
C.M.S.A.(MD)No.29 of 2017
21.12.2023
Chitra @ Lakshmi
G.Sivalingam @ Arunachalam
L.Victoria Gowri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
