In this transfer civil miscellaneous petition regarding a patent appeal, the High Court of Madras dismissed the petition and the appeal after the appellant sought and obtained withdrawal of the appeal.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.11.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
(T)CMP(PT)/40/2023 (T)CMA(PT)/SR.220/2023 (OA/SR.46/2017/PT/CHN)
M/s.Roskilde University
Universitetsvej 1, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark .
... Petitioner
-vs-
M/s.The Controller of Patents, The Patent Office, Chennai.
... Respondent
PRAYER in (T)CMP(PT)/40/2023 : Transfer Civil Miscellaneous
Petition (Patents) is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, praying to condone the delay of 1 day in filing the Appeal petition along with the supporting documents against the Order dated 30.03.2017 passed by Controller of Patent in Patent Application No. 2973/CHENP/2010.
1/4
PRAYER in (T)CMA(PT)/SR.220/2023 : Transfer Civil Miscellaneous
Appeal (Patents) is filed under Section 117-A of the Patents Act, 1970, praying to set aside the order dated 30.03.2017 passed by the respondent in Patent Application No.2973/CHENP/2010 and a patent is granted in respect of 2973/CHENP/2010 and the appellant be allowed an opportunity to be heard in the matter before passing any adverse orders and the appellant be allowed to make suitable claim amendments, if required and an early hearing is scheduled in the matter.
For Petitioner / : Mr.Dominic Alvares intending appellant for M/s.S.Majumdar and Co.
For Respondent 1 : Mr.K.Gunasekar, CGSC
For Respondent 2 : Mr.Julick Isaiah for M/s.De Penning and De Penning
2/4
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner / intending appellant submits that he has been instructed to withdraw the appeal. An endorsement has been made for the said purpose. Consequently, (T)CMP(PT)/40/2023 is dismissed and the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn at the SR stage.
27.11.2023
rna Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes / No
3/4
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
rna
(T)CMP(PT)/40/2023 (T)CMA(PT)/SR.220/2023 (OA/SR.46/2017/PT/CHN)
27.11.2023
4/4
M/s. Roskilde University
M/s. The Controller of Patents
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
