Allowed

J. Senthilvel, v. Visalakshi

Madras HC17 Nov 2023CMP(MD)/8993/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, by way of a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Order 41 Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, considered a prayer to set aside an order dismissing a first appeal for default. The court, being satisfied with the reasons via affidavit, allowed the petition and directed the restoration of the appeal.

What did the court decide?

The petition is allowed and the First Appeal is to be restored; the main case is to be posted on 07.12.2023.

J. Senthilvel, Vs Visalakshi — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Friday, the Seventeenth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT

¶2

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice L. VICTORIA GOWRI

¶3

CMP(MD). No.8993 of 2023 in AS.No.10 of 1995

¶4

J. Senthilvel, ... Petitioner/Appellant Vs

1 Visalakshi

2 Vairavan,

3 Jothimani,

4 Rajalakshmi,

5 Minor.Rajamanickam(Died), ... Respondents/Respondents

¶10

Prayer :-

¶11

Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed Under Order 41 Rule 19 of Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the order passed in A.S. No. 10 of 1995 dated 14.06.2023 and Restore the above first appeal in A.S. No. 10 of 1995 which was dismissed for default on 14.06.2023 by this Honourable Court and pass such further or other orders.

¶12

Prayer in AS. 10/ 1995 :

¶13

Appeal Suit is filed Under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code,against the Judgement and Decree made in O.S.No. 22 of 1986 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Devakottai, dated 08/03/1994.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/3

¶16

ORDER:- This Petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/s. M.Kannan, Advocate for the Petitioner and No Appearance, for the respondent, this Court made the following order:

¶17

This petition is filed to set aside the order passed in A.S.No.10 of 1995 dated

¶18

14.06.2023 and restore the First Appeal which was dismissed for default.

¶19

Heard.

¶20

Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this

¶21

petition is allowed. Registry is directed to restore the First Appeal.

¶22

Post the main case on 07.12.2023 .

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(CS III) // True Copy //

¶25

/11/2023 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

¶27

The Subordinate Judge, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Devakottai.

¶28

2/3

¶29

The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madars High Court, Madurai.

¶30

3 The Section Officer, Judicial Section, Madurai Bench of Madars High Court, Madurai.

¶31

ORDER DATED : 17/11/2023

¶32

==========================

¶33

ORDER

¶34

==========================

¶35

CMP(MD). No.8993 of 2023 in AS.No.10 of 1995

¶36

Giving direction and etc.

¶37

as stated within.

¶38

MK/27.11.2023 3P 5C

¶39

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

3/3

J. Senthilvel, v. Visalakshi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J. Senthilvel, v. Visalakshi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Revathi Vs N.Rajendran

S.Marimuthu, Vs Mrs.Lakshmikantham

V.Palaniappan Vs I.Azimudeen

L.Kurumba Thevan Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Pathimuthu Hajara M Vs The Director of Elementary Education

Jayaraj .J Vs The Chief Educational Officer