Partly allowed

Veerammal, v. M. Murugalakshmi

Madras HC15 Nov 2023CMP(MD)/7148/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Rule 75(6) seeking call for records of specific documents. The Madras High Court directed the Inspector of Police to produce the FIR copy but dismissed the prayer for unregistered agreements, granting liberty to file an appropriate application in the main case.

What did the court decide?

Directed Inspector of Police, Sattur Town, to produce the copy of FIR in Cr.No.543/2020. Liberty granted to file appropriate application in main case regarding unregistered rental agreement. Prayer fo

Veerammal, Vs M. Murugalakshmi — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.M.P(MD)No.7148 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Fifteenth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty Three

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Honble Mr.Justice RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN and The Honble Mr.Justice P.B. BALAJI

¶6

C.M.P(MD)No.7148 of 2022 in A.S(MD)No.67 of 2021

1 VEERAMMAL

2 PUSHPA

3 K.RAJKUMAR

4 RENUKA DEVI

... PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS

¶12

¶13

M.MURUGALAKSHMI ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶14

Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to direct the Tasmac District Manager, Virudhunagar District and Inspector of Police, Sattur Town Police Station to produce the unregistered rental agreement dated 27.02.2017 with connected agreements and FIR Copy in Cr. No. 543/2020 on the file of the Sattur Town Police Station and to mark them as Additional evidence and thus render justice.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/3

¶17

C.M.P(MD)No.7148 of 2022

¶18

Prayer in AS(MD). 67/ 2021 :

¶19

To allow the appeal by setting aside the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No.39 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur, dated 11.12.2020.

¶20

ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.J.GUNASEELAN MUTHIAH, Advocate for the petitioners and of MRS.S.MAHALAKSHMI, Advocate on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶21

(Order of the Court was made by RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J)

¶22

This petition is filed under Rule 75(6) of Civil Rule of Practice to call for the records of the District Manager, TASMAC, Virudhunagar District to produce the unregistered rental agreement, dated 27.02.2017 and also to call for the copy of the FIR in Cr.No.543 of 2020 on the file of the Sattur Town Police Station.

¶23

After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, without prejudice to the contention of the respondent / plaintiff, the Inspector of Police, Sattur Town Police Station is hereby required to produce the copy of the FIR in Cr.No.543 of 2020. With regard to the remaining prayer, liberty is given to the petitioner to file appropriate application under appropriate Rule in respect of alleged unregistered rental

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

2/3

¶26

C.M.P(MD)No.7148 of 2022

¶27

agreement said to have been registered in the name of the defendant with the TASMAC. The allegations and counter allegations to be decided in the main case and hence, C.M.P(MD)No.7148 of 2022 is allowed to the limited extend in respect of call

¶28

for records in FIR stated above.

¶29

sd/15/11/2023

¶30

/ TRUE COPY /

¶31

/11/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶32

¶33

¶34

THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

¶35

COPY TO

¶36

1.THE DISTRICT MANAGER, TASMAC, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT

¶37

2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATTUR TOWN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT

¶38

ORDER IN C.M.P(MD)No.7148 of 2022 in

¶39

A.S(MD)No.67 of 2021 Date :15/11/2023

¶40

RK/JGB (20/11/2023) 3P / 4C

¶41

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

3/3

Veerammal, v. M. Murugalakshmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Veerammal, v. M. Murugalakshmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Manager Vs M.Sangeetha

Branch Manager Vs Pappathi

Reliance General Insurance Co. Vs Sutha Devi

Veerammal, Vs M.Murugalakshmi

Loganathan Vs The Managing Director

Mr.C.Rajasekar Vs Mrs.Muthumeena