Allowed

Uma Suryan v. Ammaiyakkal

Madras HC29 Nov 2023CMP(MD)/589/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Petition for the return of original exhibits (Ex.B6 to Ex.B27) marked by the appellant-defendant in the underlying suit. The petition was permitted subject to an undertaking to produce originals when required, and the registry substituted certified copies in the appeal file.

What did the court decide?

Return of original exhibits Ex.B6 to Ex.B27 to the petitioner, subject to undertaking to produce originals later; registry to substitute certified copies.

Uma Suryan Vs Ammaiyakkal — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

CMP(MD) No.589 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twenty Ninth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty Three

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Honble Mr.Justice RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN and The Honble Mr.Justice P.B.BALAJI

¶6

CMP(MD) No.589 of 2023 IN AS(MD) No.50 of 2021

¶7

UMA SURYAN ... PETITIONER/1^st RESPONDENT Vs 1 AMMAIYAKKAL ... 1^st RESPONDENT/1^st APPELLANT 2 S.SELVARAJA ... 2^nd RESPONDENT/2^nd APPELLANT 3 GURUVESHWARI ... 3^rd RESPONDENT/2^nd RESPONDENT 4 ANBUVALLI ... 4^th RESPONDENT/3^rd RESPONDENT

¶8

Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to return the documents namely Ex.B.6 to Ex.B.27 marked before the trial court in O.S.No. 60 of 2012 before the Honourale I Additional District Court, Madurai to the petitioner and thus render justice.

¶9

Prayer in AS(MD). 50/ 2021 :

¶10

To prefer the Memorandum of grounds of First Appeal against the Judgment and decree dated 18.09.2020 made in OS No. 60/2012 on the file of the I Additional https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis District Judge, Madurai.

¶11

1/4

¶12

CMP(MD) No.589 of 2023

¶13

ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.T.K.RAJASEKARAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.R.RAJESH, Advocate for Mr.M.MAHARAJA, on behalf of the Respondents nO.1 & 2 and Mr.MUTHUKAMATCHI, Advocate for the 3^rd Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶14

(Order of the Court was made by P.B.BALAJI,J)

¶15

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been taken out by the first respondent in the appeal seeking for return of Ex.B6 to Ex.B-27 which have been marked on her side, as defendant, before the I Additional District Court, Madurai in O.S.No.60 of 2012.

¶16

We have perused the affidavit filed in support of the application.

¶17

The petitioner has stated that the documents are required for maintaining the

¶18

property and the learned counsel for the petitioner also states that the certified copies of the said documents viz., Ex.B6 to Ex.B27 have already been filed before the Registry.

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the respondents strongly objected for allowing this application.

¶20

We have heard the parties and perused the affidavit and records filed by way of typed set of papers.

¶21

Ex.B6 to Ex.B27 are original sale deeds and release deeds marked by the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

2/4

¶23

CMP(MD) No.589 of 2023

¶24

petitioner as defendant in the suit. The defendants also succeeded before the trial Court and the plaintiffs have filed the present appeal.

¶25

Considering the averments made in the affidavit, we do not see any impediment for ordering return of the documents Ex.B6 to Ex.B27. Accordingly, C.M.P(MD)No.589 of 2023 is allowed. However, while receiving the documents, the petitioner shall given an undertaking before the Registry to the effect that at the time of final hearing or as and when required by this Court, she will produce the original documents.

¶26

Registry shall substitute the certified copies in the appeal in lieu of the

¶27

original exhibits that are being returned to the petitioner.

¶28

sd/29/11/2023

¶29

/ TRUE COPY /

¶30

/12/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶31

AM TO

¶32

THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MADURAI.

¶33

COPY TO:

¶34

1 THE SECTION OFFICER V.R.SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/4

¶36

CMP(MD) No.589 of 2023

¶37

2 THE SECTION OFFICER, JUDICIAL SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶38

+1 CC to M/s.V.MUTHUKAMATCHI, Advocate ( SR-17134[I] dated 30/11/2023 )

¶39

+1 CC to M/s.T.K.RAJASEKARAN, Advocate ( SR-17153[I] dated 01/12/2023 )

¶40

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.589 of 2023 IN AS(MD) No.50 of 2021 Date :29/11/2023

¶41

SA/SKN/SAR. /01.12.2023/4P/6C

¶42

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

4/4

Uma Suryan v. Ammaiyakkal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uma Suryan v. Ammaiyakkal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Oriental Insurance Vs Kanagavalli,W/O.Makash

I.Udaya Kumar, Vs Mrs.M.Abinaya

S. Hemachandran Vs Jeyapriya

Vigneshwaran, Vs M.Ayeswariyalakshmi

A.Emily Sharon Vs a.Robin Rath Prakash

C.Rajkumar Vs K.Nagarajan