Allowed

The Project Director, v. J.Vijayakumaran

Madras HC18 Dec 2023CMP(MD)/3238/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil miscellaneous petition filed by the appellant seeking an extension of time to comply with a prior interim stay order in a civil appeal. The court granted six weeks from the date of order. This is a procedural order extending time.

What did the court decide?

Six weeks time granted from today to comply with the condition to deposit amount with interest, failing which the interim order shall stand vacated automatically.

The Project Director, Vs J.Vijayakumaran — Arbitration | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

CMP(MD) No.3238 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Eighteenth day of December Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

¶3

and The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.B. BALAJI CMP(MD) No.3238 of 2021 in CMA(MD) No.97 of 2021

¶4

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, (NATIONAL HIGHWAYS NO.-7), NATINAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, PLOT NO.3, SURIYA TOWERS, 2ND FLOOR, IST EAST STREET, K.K.NAGAR, (NEAR MUTHUVELRAJAN HOSPITAL), MADURAI-20

¶5

... Petitioner / Petitioner / Appellant

¶6

¶7

1 J.VIJAYAKUMARAN

¶8

2 THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER/ LAND ACQUISITION, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS -7), COLLECTORATE BUILDING, MADURAI - 625 020. ... Respondents / Respondents / Respondents

¶9

Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to extend 3 months time to comply with the order made in CMP(MD) No.868of 2021 in CMA(MD) No.97of 2021 daetd 09.02.2021.

¶10

Prayer in CMA(MD). 97/ 2021 :

¶11

To set aside the order made in Arbitration OP No. 93 of 2015 dated. 19.03.2020 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Madurai.

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

1/3

¶14

CMP(MD) No.3238 of 2021

¶15

ORDER : This civil miscellaneous petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.S.SANKARA PANDIAN, Advocate for M/S.C.ARUL VADIVEL ASSOCIATES, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.R.GOVINDARAJ, Advocate on behalf of the Respondent No.1, the court made the following order:-

¶16

By an order dated 09.02.2021, this Court had granted interim stay on condition to deposit the entire award amount with accrued interest to the credit of Arbitration O.P.No.93/2015 before the Principal District Court, Madurai, on or before 09.03.2021. On 10.03.2021, this petition appears to have been filed.

¶17

2.We have noticed that in the earlier order instead of typing Arbitration O.P.No.93/2015, it is wrongly typed as MCOP No.93/2015. The same hereby stands modified. To comply with the condition, six weeks time is granted from today, failing which, the interim order already granted shall stand vacated automatically without further reference to this court. It is made clear that no further extension petition will be entertained at any cost.

¶18

sd/18/12/2023

¶19

/ TRUE COPY /

¶20

/12/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶21

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

2/3

¶24

CMP(MD) No.3238 of 2021

¶25

¶26

The Principal District Judge, Madurai.

¶27

Copy to:

¶28

The Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶29

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.3238 of 2021 in CMA(MD) No.97 of 2021 Date :18/12/2023

¶30

ED/ JGB /SAR- (22/12/2023) 3P / 3C

¶31

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

3/3

The Project Director, v. J.Vijayakumaran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Project Director, v. J.Vijayakumaran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Project Director Vs v. Vijayaraj

The Project Director Vs Lingammal(died) 1.Lakshmanan

The Project Director Vs Lingammal(Died), 1).Lakshmanan

The Projector Dirctor Vs J.Vijayakumaran

Nithya, Vs K. Babu

The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Vs M/s. Tamilnadu Spinning Mills Association