Dismissed

M.Chokalingam, v. Leo Felix Louis

Madras HC26 Apr 2023CMP(MD)/2735/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two civil miscellaneous petitions filed to condone a 417-day delay in presenting review applications. The court condoned the delay upon the payment of Rs.2,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Authority and dismissed the petitions accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 417 days condoned on payment of Rs. 2000/- to High Court Legal Services Authority; petitions disposed accordingly.

M.Chokalingam, Vs Leo Felix Louis — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.M.P.(MD) Nos.2735 and 2737 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twenty Sixth day of April Two Thousand and Twenty Three

¶4

PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

C.M.P.(MD) Nos.2735 and 2737 of 2023 in Review Application (MD) SR Nos.62213 and 62161 of 2021 in S.A.(MD) Nos.456 & 457 of 2021

¶6

M.CHOCKALINGAM, ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT IN BOTH PETITIONS Vs 1 LEO FELIX LOUIS 2 K.MOHANRAJ ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN CMP(MD).2735/2023

¶7

1 TOM EDWIN LOUIS

¶8

2 K.MOHANRAJ ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN CMP(MD).2737/2023

¶9

Prayer in CMP(MD). 2735/ 2023 :

¶10

Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 417 days in filing in re-presenting in Rev.App.SR.(MD).No.62213 of 2021 and thus render justice. Prayer in CMP(MD). 2737/ 2023 :

¶11

To condone the delay of 417 days in filing in re-presenting in Rev.App.SR.(MD).No.62161 of 2021 and thus render justice. Prayer in REV.APLC.SR(MD).62213/2021:

¶12

Pleased to Review the Judgment and Decree passed in SA(MD). 456/2021 on the file of this Hon'ble Court reserved on 07.10.2021 and devlivered on 22.10.2021 by allowing the Second Appeal. Prayer in REV.APLC.SR(MD).62161/2021:

¶13

Pleased to Review the Judgment and Decree passed in SA(MD). 457/2021 on the file of this Hon'ble Court reserved on 07.10.2021 and devlivered on 22.10.2021 by allowing the Second Appeal. Prayer in SA(MD). 456/ 2021 :

¶14

Pleased to set aside the Judgment and Decree passed in AS No. 5 of 2016 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Pudukkottai dated 09.09.2020 confirming the Judgment and Decree passed in OS https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/2

¶16

C.M.P.(MD) Nos.2735 and 2737 of 2023

¶17

No.106 of 2007 dated 24.11.2014 on the file of Principal Subordinate Court, Pudukkottai by allowing the Second Appeal and thus render justice.

¶18

Prayer in SA(MD). 457/ 2021 :

¶19

Pleased to set aside the Judgment and Decree passed in AS No. 11 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Pudukkottai dated 09.09.2020 confirming the Judgment and Decree passed in OS No.107 of 2007 dated 24.11.2014 on the file of Principal Subordinate Court, Pudukkottai by allowing the Second Appeal and thus render justice.

¶20

ORDER : These petitions coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petitions and the affidavits filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.PARANJOTHI, Advocate for the petitioner in both Petitions, and of on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶21

The present petitions have been filed seeking to condone the delay of 417 days in re-presenting the Review Applications.

¶22

2.Considering the reasons adduced in the affidavits filed in support of the petitions, the delay is condoned, however, on payment of a sum of Rs.2000/- to the High Court Legal Services Authority attached to Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.

¶23

The petitions are ordered accordingly.

¶24

/ TRUE COPY /

¶25

/05/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶26

SSK/AAV

¶27

¶28

1 THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, PUDUKKOTTAI. 2 THE PRINCIPAL SUBORDINATE JUDGE, PUDUKKOTTAI. COPY TO:

¶29

THE OFFICER INCHARGE,

¶30

LEGAL AID SERVICE AUTHORITY, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN

¶31

C.M.P.(MD) Nos.2735 and 2737 of 2023 in

¶32

Review Application (MD) SR Nos.62213 and 62161 of 2021 in

¶33

SS/VR/SAR.3/17.05.2023/2P/4C

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

2/2

M.Chokalingam, v. Leo Felix Louis

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Chokalingam, v. Leo Felix Louis

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thiruselvi Vs the State Rep by Its

S.Baranidharan Vs the State Rep by Its

Vijay @ Monkey Vijay Vs Inspector of Police

Vijay Vs State Rep by, the Inspector of Police

Prakash Vs the State Rep by Its

P. Muthupandi Vs the State Rep.by