S.Nandhini v. The Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court restored the dismissed Writ Appeal on condition that the petitioner deposits Rs.5,000 with the High Court Legal Services Committee within two weeks, failing which the restoration order will be vacated.
What did the court decide?
Restoration of the Writ Appeal on condition that the petitioner deposits Rs.5,000 with the High Court Legal Services Committee within two weeks.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No.7258 of 2022 in W.A.No.1928 of 2018
C.M.P.No.7258 of 2022 in W.A.No.1928 of 2018
R.SURESH KUMAR, J. AND
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.]
Heard Mr.G.Anandakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and
Mr.K.Rajkumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent TANGEDCO.
- Though the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/ appellant had stated that due to some technical glitches, he could not attend in the Video-Conference, we are not inclined to accept the said reason as there has been absence consecutively for three hearings, that is why the earlier Division Bench on 01.12.2021 dismissed the Writ Appeal for non-prosecution.
- Anyhow the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant since
make a fervent appeal before this Court that the valuable rights of the parties cannot be deprived because of this order of dismissal on default
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ appeal should be restored after disallowance of the plea of technical default due to consecutive absences.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Suresh Kumar
- respondent
TANGEDCO
Coram
R.Suresh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court