This order allows and disposes of a condonation application regarding the delay in filing W.A.No.SR 35224 of 2023. The court condoned the 84-day delay based on the reasons mentioned in the accompanying affidavit.
Condonation of delay of 84 days in filing the application allowed and application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.6577 of 2023
in
W.A.No.SR 35224 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.
Heard learned Additional Advocate General for the applicants.
Learned counsel for the nonapplicants opposes the application on the ground that no sufficient cause is mentioned.
The delay is of 84 days. For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit along with the application, the delay caused in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is allowed and disposed of.
kpl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 84 days in filing the writ application is condonable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.
UNKNOWN JUDGE
P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
