Allowed
Rovathal v. R.Kolandasamy
Madras HCCMP/6226/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This order condensed a 10-day delay in filing an appeal suit because the second respondent raised no objection and the reasons in the affidavit were satisfactory.
What did the court decide?
The delay of 10 days was condoned and the petition was allowed as prayed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
C.M.P. No. 6226 of 2023 in
¶2
A.S.SR. No. 11198 of 2023
¶3
S. VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND
¶4
R. KALAIMATHI,J.
¶5
The above C.M.P. has been filed to condone the delay of 10 days in filing the appeal suit.
¶6
- Respondents 1 and 3 have been served and their names are printed in the cause list. Hence, service on respondents 1 and 3 is deemed to be complete.
¶7
- Mr.M. Guruprasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the 2nd respondent expressed "No Objection" for condoning the delay.
¶8
- In view of "No Objection" expressed by the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent and having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the miscellaneous petition, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered as prayed for.
¶9
(S.V.N.J.) (R.K.M.J.) nv 27.04.2023
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether delay in filing appeal suit should be condoned.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Petitioner (unnamed in text)
- respondent
Respondents 1 and 3 (unnamed in text)
- respondent
Respondent 2 (unnamed in text)
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court