Muthu v. Neelavathy
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2023 in WA No.SR 88946 of 2022 THE HON'BLE
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP No.483 of 2023 in WA No.SR 88946 of 2022
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.
This is an application for condonation of delay of 123 days in re-presenting filing the appeal.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the non-applicant No.1 and learned Government Pleader. Learned counsel for non-applicant No.1 opposes the application.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the delay caused in re-presenting the appeal is condoned. The application is allowed and disposed of.
tar
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Non-applicant No.1
Coram
Chief Justice
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court