This order considers a petition for condoning a delay of 213 days in representing an appeal. The court found the delay condonable based on the affidavit and allowed and disposed of the petition since the respondent did not appear.
Condonation of delay of 213 days in representing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
C.M.P.No.3651 of 2023 in W.A.SR.No.4001 of 2022
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.
Heard Mr.D.Baskar, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Office endorsement shows that the respondent is served, but none appears for the respondent.
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 213 days in representing the appeal.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the delay of 213 days in representing the appeal is condoned. The petition stands allowed and is disposed of.
drm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 213 days in representing the appeal should be condoned.
Petitioners
Respondent
The Hon'ble Chief Justice
P.D.Audikeshavalu, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
