This constitutional petition seeks condonation of a 3-day delay in filing an appeal against a Motor Accident Tribunal decree. The court condoned the delay upon satisfaction of the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and directed registry action.
The petition stands allowed; the Registry is directed to number the appeal if papers are in order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.No.21450 of 2023 in CMA.SR.No.113744 of 2023
N.SESHASAYEE, J.
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 3 days in filing the appeal against the Judgement and Decree dated 26.04.2023 made in MCOP.No.506 of 2022 on the file of the Principal Sub Court and Motor Accident Tribunal at Puducherry.
2.Mr.R.Sreedhar, learned counsel takes notice for R1.
3.There is no appearance for R2 and R3.
4.Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition stands allowed and the Registry is directed to number the above C.M.A.SR.No.113744 of 2023, if the papers are otherwise in order.
13.12.2023
Tsg
1/1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the 3-day delay in filing the appeal against the Judgement and Decree dated 26.04.2023 should be condoned.
Whether the accompanying affidavit contains sufficient reasons to justify condonation of delay.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. R. Sreedhar / R1
R2
R3
N.SESHASAYEE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
