Single bench allowed an application to condone a delay of 80 days in preferring an appeal, relying on affidavit. Registry directed to print respondent counsel's name.
Condons 80-days delay in filing appeal; allows application and disposes of it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
C.M.P.No.19272 of 2023 in W.A.SR.No.98732 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
Heard Mr.Su.Srinivasan, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr.P.Navaneetha Krishnan, learned counsel for the non-applicant.
This application is filed to condone the delay of 80 days in preferring the appeal.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the delay of 80 days in preferring the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, the application stands allowed and disposed of.
Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.P.Navaneetha Krishnan, as learned counsel for the respondent in the appeal.
drm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 80 days in filing the appeal requires condonation under the National High Court Rules.
C.M.P. (Chief Justice)
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
