The Court condoned a delay of 442 days in preferring an appeal based on an affidavit filed under the accompanying conditions. The petition for condonation of delay was allowed and the impugned order was disposed of.
Condonation of delay of 442 days towards the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.19206 of 2023 in W.A.SR.No.106440 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
Heard Mrs.R.Anitha, learned Special Government Pleader for Mr.B.Vijay, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr.P.J.Rishikesh, learned counsel for respondent 1 and Mr.T.K.Saravanan, learned Government Advocate for respondents 2 and 3.
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 442 days in preferring the appeal.
Learned counsel for respondent 1 opposes the petition on the ground that no sufficient cause is mentioned.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the delay of 442 days in preferring the appeal is condoned. The petition stands allowed and is disposed of.
drm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 442 days in preferring the appeal can be condoned?
B. Vijay
Respondent 1
Respondent 2
Respondent 3
Chief Justice
Bharatha Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
