The Act Court condoned a 277-day delay in filing an appeal by a petitioner against a Single Judge's order. The court held that the revenue records' classification of the land as 'anatheenam' justified condoning the belated appeal.
Delay of 277 days in filing the appeal was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP No.1042 of 2023 in WA No.SR 1568 of 2023
THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent, we do not find any averment to reject the prayer of the petitioners to condone the delay of 277 days in filing the appeal, challenging the order of the learned Single Judge, inasmuch as the revenue records produced by learned State Government Pleader shows that the land in question is classified as “anatheenam”. Hence, the delay is condoned.
kpl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 277 days in filing the appeal should be condoned given the land classification as 'anatheenam' in revenue records.
Petitioners
Respondent
The Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
