Amarnath Rameshbabu Sole Proprietor, M/s. Anrb Photo Artsitry, v. The Registrar of Trade Marks
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed for nonprosecution as the appellant failed to appear at the hearing despite notice being served.
The appeal was dismissed for nonprosecution as the appellant failed to appear at the hearing despite notice being served.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(T)CMA(TM)/90/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.11.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY (T)CMA(TM)/90/2023 (OA/18/2020/TM/CHN)
Amarnath Rameshbabu, Sole Proprietor, M/s.ANRB Photo Artsitry, No.2, P.S. Sivaswamy Salai, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. ... Appellant
-vs-
The Registrar of Trade Marks, Trade Mark Registry, Boudhik Sampada Bhawan, G.S.T.Road, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032. ... Respondent
PRAYER : Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (Trade Marks) filed under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, praying to stay the order dated 01.11.2019 passed by the Learned Examiner and set aside the same in Application No.3403590 pertaining to the mark BIG SHORT FILMS; this Appeal be allowed and registration of the Trade Mark BIG SHORT FILMS be granted to the Appellant based on Application No.3403590; the Court may direct the Registrar of Trade Marks, Chennai, to revert and or change the status of the Trade Mark BIG SHORT FILMS bearing Application No.3403590 in Class 41 and costs of these proceedings be awarded to the Appellant.
1/2
(T)CMA(TM)/90/2023
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
kal
For Appellant : No Appearance
For Respondent : Mr.A.R.Sakthivel, SPC
JUDGMENT
The matter is listed today under the caption "for dismissal" because the appellant was not represented at the hearing on 15.11.2023, in spite of notice being served on the appellant on 07.07.2023, as per the bailiff's report. At today's hearing, once again, the appellant continues to remain unrepresented.
23.11.2023
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes/No kal
(T)CMA(TM)/90/2023 (OA/18/2020/TM/CHN)
2/2
Amarnath Rameshbabu
The Registrar of Trade Marks
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court