counsel to term the marriage as irretrievable break down of the marriage cannot be accepted for more than one ground. From the incident stated supra and the conduct of the husband in issuing Ex.P4 and after issuance of Ex.P6, he had instituted the judicial proceedings and continued to the judicial proceedings and not allowed the wife from restoring of conjugal rights. Furthermore, after the conclusion of the Domestic Violence Act on technical ground, he has amended the petition, as if, false criminal case projected by way of additional grounds for divorce and hence, I find that for the action and conduct of the husband, the wife was not in a position to reunite with the husband along with the children and the husband has not taken any steps for restitution of conjugal right and he has not taken any steps to bring the wife and child to the matrimonial home, he is not interested in a marital life and hence, it is by his own act, separation between the parties is continuous and he cannot be allowed to take advantage of his own action of wrong and hence, we find that the irretrievable break down of marriage as projected now is because of the act
