Disposed

T.v.S.Vishalakshimi v. N.Ramakrishnan

Madras HC11 Dec 2023CMA/646/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this civil appeal regarding a suit for deposit of title deeds, the High Court noted the parties are senior citizens. The Court recorded that the respondent would provide copies of documents and directed the trial court to prioritize the case under senior citizen provisions before summer vacations, disposing of the appeal without costs.

What did the court decide?

Directed the trial court to include the case under senior citizen category and dispose of it before summer vacation 2024; appeal disposed of without costs.

T.v.S.Vishalakshimi Vs N.Ramakrishnan — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.M.A.No.646 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.12.2023

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

¶5

C.M.A.No.646 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.5389 of 2023

T.V.S.Vishalakshimi

... Appellant

Vs.

N.Ramakrishnan ... Respondent

¶10

PRAYER:This Appeal is filed to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 22.11.2022 passed by the V Additional District Court, Coimbatore in I.A.No.2 of 2021 in O.S.No.845 of 2021.

¶11

For appellant : Mr.B.S.Jhothiraman

¶12

For respondent : Mr.C.Veera Raghavan

¶13

JUDGMENT

¶14

This appeal is filed challenging an order passed by the trial Court in I.A.No.2 of 2021 in O.S.No.845 of 2021, which the appellant / plaintiff herein has filed for deposit of the original title deeds pertaining to suit

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

C.M.A.No.646 of 2023

¶18

property into the Court.

¶19

2.Heard both sides.

¶20

3.The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the plaintiff would be

¶21

rest contented if the copies of the title documents to the suit property are provided to her.

¶22

4.The learned counsel for the respondent / 3rd defendant submits that he is

¶23

right away handing over the copies of the title documents which he now has to the other side. This is recorded.

¶24

5.If any other document is required by the plaintiff, then she is required to take out such necessary application before the trial Court and not by way of a petition for mandatory injunction.

¶25

6.This Court is informed that the parties are senior citizens and some of

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

C.M.A.No.646 of 2023

¶29

them are in their mid seventies. The trial Court is now required to include the case in the senior citizen cases and try to dispose of the matter preferably before summer vacation in 2024.

¶30

7.This Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶31

27.11.2023

¶32

kas Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation To. The V Additional District Court Coimbatore

N.SESHASAYEE, J.

kas

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

C.M.A.No.646 of 2023

¶38

C.M.A.No.646 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.5389 of 2023

¶39

11.12.2023

¶40

4/4

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

T.v.S.Vishalakshimi v. N.Ramakrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.v.S.Vishalakshimi v. N.Ramakrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Poongodi

The Managing Director, Vs Mohammed Hassane

M.Pandian Vs S.Mahadevan

The Divisional Manager Vs R.Sivakumar

R.Ranjithavalli Vs S.Muthulakshmi

National Insurance Company Limited Vs Minor Jaasmitha