K. Palanisamy v. Krishnaveni
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeal as infructuous because the respondent died shortly before the hearing. No substantive legal question was decided.
What the court decided
C.M.A.No.475 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.06.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHACHAKRAVARTHY
C.M.A.No.475 of 2016
K.Palanisamy
... Appellant
Vs.
Krishnaveni
..Respondent
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against the judgment and decree of the Additional Family Court of Coimbatore dated 16.11.2015 in H.M.O.P.No.212 of 2010
For Appellant : Mr.V.Nicholas
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.Palanisamy
- respondent
Krishnaveni
Coram
J.Nisha Banu
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court