Dismissed
R.Baggialakshmi v. R.Jeyadevan
Madras HCCMA/353/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This court dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to appear on the dates listed for hearing.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
C.M.A.No.353 of 2019
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶3
DATED : 15.11.2023
¶4
CORAM :
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI
¶6
C.M.A.No.353 of 2019
¶7
- R.Baggialakshmi
¶8
- R.Rajeshkumar
¶9
- R.Senthilkumar
¶10
- R.Deeparani ... Petitioners/Appellants
¶11
Vs.
¶12
- R.Jeyadevan
¶13
- Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co.Ltd., 24, 4th Cross, Lalji Nagar, Lakkasandra, Bangalore.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal can be dismissed for non-prosecution when appellants fail to appear.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
R.Baggialakshmi
- appellant
R.Rajeshkumar
- appellant
R.Senthilkumar
- appellant
R.Deeparani
- respondent
R.Jeyadevan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · M.dhandapani
- Order 2 · N. Anand Venkatesh
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court