The United India Insurance Co.Ltd v. Rajamani
Madras HCCMA/2388/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2018 P.B.BALAJI, J. The matter is listed…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
C.M.A.Nos.2388 and 2390 of 2018
¶2
P.B.BALAJI, J.
¶3
The matter is listed today under the caption for 'being mentioned'.
¶4
- The Registry has expressed difficulty in drafting the decree on the ground that the minor guardian was represented by next friend mother who has been mentioned as Rajamani being the first claimant/first respondent in C.M.A.No.2388 of 2018. However, while describing the minor the name of the guardian mother has been mentioned as Rajammal instead of Rajamani.
¶5
- It is admitted that the correct name should be Rajamani. Unfortunately, the decree passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal reflects the name as Rajammal. The respondents/claimants are given liberty to seek amendment of the decree by filing appropriate application before this Court/Tribunal as may be adviced.
¶6
29.09.2023.
¶7
kpr
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court