R.Gomathy Ammal v. C.R.Gandhi
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for default after the appellants failed to appear on listing date despite prior notice.
What did the court decide?
Appeal suit dismissed for default. No costs awarded.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 01.08.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
A.S.(MD)No.74 of 2014
1.R.Gomathy Ammal 2.A.Shankar
...Appellants
/Vs./
1.C.R.Gandhi
2.G.P.Puhazh
3.G.P.Malar
4.G.P.Priya
...Respondents
PRAYER:- Appeal Suit- filed under Clause Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code to call for the records relating to the fair and decreetal order passed by the District Court, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil in I.A.No.151 of 2012 in O.S.No.26 of 2012, dated 31.10.2012 and set aside the same and may restore the suit on file.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R. Gomathy Ammal
- appellant
A. Shankar
- respondent
C. R. Gandhi
- respondent
G. P. Puhazh
- respondent
G. P. Malar
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court