Allowed

Siyathubava v. Salhabeevi

Madras HC7 Jun 2023AS(MD)/193/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court disposed of an appeal suit challenging a partition decree after the appellant and respondents entered into a compromise in Court to divide properties equally via registered documents. The Court ordered setting aside the lower court judgment and made the compromise memo part of the record.

What did the court decide?

The appeal suit is disposed of in terms of the memo of compromise, and the judgment of the Court below is set aside.

Siyathubava Vs Salhabeevi — Partition | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATED : 07.06.2023

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶5

A.S(MD)No.193 of 2022 and C.M.P(MD)No.8351 of 2022

¶6

S.Siyathu Bava :Appellant/Second respondent

¶7

.vs.

¶8

1.M.Salhabeevi :First Respondent/Plaintiff 2.S.Nabeezhzbeevi 3.S.Sheikabdulla 4.S.Rahamathunisha 5.S.Inulpasariya 6.M.Aayeeshamariyam 7.S.Naina Mohamed :Respondent 2 to 7/Defendants

¶9

PRAYER: Appeal Suit filed under Order 41 Rule 1 r/w Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.57of 2013, dated 31.3.2021, partly dismissing the suit, on the filing of the Court of Principal District Judge, Sivagangai.

¶10

For Appellant :Mr.T.Thirumurugan

¶11

1/4

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

For Respondents :Mr.V.K.Peter Rajan 1 and 5

¶14

For Respondent-2 :Mr.K.Vignesh Kumar

¶15

For Respondent-7 :Mr.J.Anandkumar

¶16

For Respondents :No appearance 3,4 and 6

¶17

**JUDGMENT ***************

¶18

The appellant has filed this appeal suit challenging the decree granting partition.

¶19

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the appellant is present and 7^th respondent, who is none other than the brother of the appellant and the contesting respondent also present. The first respondent, who is the sister of the appellant also present. During the pendency of the appeal suit, the appellant and the respondents 1,2,5 and 7 have entered into a compromise to divide the properties equally between themselves and filed a memo to that effect incorporating the terms of compromise for partition stating that they will execute necessary deeds in future on the basis of the agreement, which is also placed before this Court. The parties have agreed to the terms of the memo. The parties have also agreed that there is no need for pursuing this appeal

¶20

2/4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

further. They have also agreed to effect partition between themselves by way of registered document. It is open to the parties to enforce the agreement to effect registered partition between themselves. The parties have also agreed before this Court that they will effect partition by way of registered document within a period of one month. The said memo is recorded.

¶23

3.In such view of the matter, the appeal suit is disposed of

¶24

in terms of memo of compromise and the judgment of the Court below in O.S.No. 57 of 2013, dated 31.3.2021 is set aside. The memo shall form part and parcel of the record. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶25

07.06.2023

¶26

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No vsn

¶27

¶28

1.The Principal District Judge, Sivagangai.

¶29

2.The Section Officer,, V.R Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶30

3/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

N.SATHISH KUMAR.,J.

¶33

vsn

¶34

JUDGMENT MADE IN A.S(MD)No.193 of 2022 and C.M.P(MD)No.8351 of 2022

¶35

07.06.2023

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

4/4

Siyathubava v. Salhabeevi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Siyathubava v. Salhabeevi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Cholamandalam Ms. General Insurance Co., Ltd., Vs S. Pandian

Abdul Razack (Died), 1. Shahul Hameed, Vs K.A.S. Ramdas,(Died)

Pitchammal Vs Bakkialakshmi

N.Ravi Vs N.Baskar

The Employees State Insurance Corporation(Sro),, Vs Essargee Mills

A.Kalyani Ammal Vs G.Thangarajan