a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- and he has to continue in possession and executed an unregistered usufructuary mortgage deed on 12.09.2011, in respect of S.No. 79/10A and the period of mortgage is two years. After the lease period, the plaintiff has to surrender the property, after receipt of the amount paid by him. These facts have not been disputed by both sides in the evidence. However, the fact remains that having admitted those facts, the so called unregistered usufructuary mortgage deed has not been accepted by the plaintiff before the Court below. But, his evidence clearly indicate that the said arrangement to continue in possession agreed for a period of two years. Thereafter, this has been extended for another three months. In the mean while, the first defendant has received a sum of Rs.16,50,000/-, on 12.12.2011 and executed Ex.A1, promissory note and the same was in the presence of P.Ws.2 and 3. It is relevant to note that it is the specific case of the first defendant that he never executed the said promissory note and the same has been created with the help of P.Ws.2 and 3. It is the specific case of the plaintiff that after expiry of the usufructuary mortgage deed period, the first defendant has demanded a sum of Rs.16,50,000/- for family necessities, after 15 days of the earlier deed. In fact, his evidence further indicate that two years period agreed and the unregistered document expired only on
