Rajkumar v. Appadurai
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed an appeal filed to set aside a trial court decree for recovery of money. Upholding the trial court's findings, it held the defendant executed a promissory note and admitted his signature on a settlement memo, confirming the decree.
What did the court decide?
Appeal A.S.No.598 of 2018 is dismissed; the decree dated 26.04.2018 in O.S.No.163 of 2015 stands confirmed.
What the court decided
A.S.No.598 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.02.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
A.S.No.598 of 2018 and
C.M.P.No.15576 of 2018
1.Rajkumar
.. Appellant
Vs.
1.Appadurai
.. Respondent
Prayer: Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgement and decree dated 26.04.2018 passed in O.S.No.163 of 2015 on the file of the 2nd Additional District Judge at Puducherry.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the findings of the trial court regarding the execution of the promissory note and the settlement memo are perverse or require interference?
Whether the respondent plaintiff is entitled to the relief of recovery of money claimed in the suit?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajkumar
- respondent
Appadurai
Coram
S.M.Subramaniam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court