property and died intestate without executing any document to any of the daughters or son. The only contention of the defendants are that Smt.Maduraiveni and Vijaya alias Vijayalakshmi had executed the Consent Deed and relinquished their right and conveyed the property in the name of their brother Mohan. Even presuming that the documents executed by them is true, it does not confer any right over the suit schedule property, since they had not been executed to convey or transfer the title. The said Consent Deed admittedly was neither registered nor written in a stamped paper. When the value of the property is more than Rs.100/- registration under the Registration Act is mandatory and in the present case, the said Consent Deed had not conveyed or transferred the title in respect of the suit mentioned property. Therefore, the Trial Court has formed an opinion that even assuming that the Consent Deed was executed by Maduraiveni mother of plaintiffs 1 to 3 and the 4th plaintiff Vijaya alias Vijayalakshmi it would not convey the title and right over the suit schedule property exclusively to Mr.Mohan, the husband of the 1st defendant and father of the other defendants. Such being the factum established, daughters of Mr.P.Chinnasami and Kannammal are also having each 1/3rd share over the suit schedule property. It is not in dispute that Mr.P.Chinnasami, father-in-
