Rajeswari v. Chanemougavadivou
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 96 CPC was dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-appearance of appellants. Connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs awarded.
What did the court decide?
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
A.S..No.485 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 06.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
A.S.No.485 of 2020 and
C.M.P.No.6374 of 2020
1.Rajeswari 2.M.Murugan 3.M.Prabakaran
4.M.Gunalan
5.M.Anandaraj 6.M.Dayanithi .. Appellants
Vs.
Chanemougavadivou .. Respondent
PRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, prayed to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 20.09.2019 made in O.S.No.141 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Puducherry.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajeswari, M.Murugan, M.Prabakaran, M.Gunalan, M.Anandaraj, M.Dayanithi
- respondent
Chanemougavadivou
Coram
T.V.THAMILSELVI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court