M/S. Cedilla v. M/S. Sai Images
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed an appeal suit for non-prosecution after the appellant failed to appear when the matter was listed for hearing on three separate occasions.
What did the court decide?
The Appeal Suit in A.S.No.260 of 2018 is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. The connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
What the court decided
A.S.No.260 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.02.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
A.S.No.260 of 2018 and
C.M.P.No.5377 of 2018
M/s.Cedilla, rep. by its Proprietor Mr.Anjan Kumar age and father name not known, having office at No.10, 9th Street, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai Chennai – 600 043
... Appellant Vs.
M/s.Sai Images, represented by its Managing Partner Mr.V.Varahal, S/o.V.N.P.Acharya, aged about 45 years, having present office address At 12/16, Zackriya Colony First Street, Chollaimedu, Chennai – 600 094.
... Respondent
Prayer: Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree of the XV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, made in O.S.No.3343 of 2016 dated 27.10.2017.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s.Cedilla
- respondent
M/s.Sai Images
Coram
S.M.Subramaniam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court