Disposed

N.Shyamala v. M/S.Suriyan Benefit Fund(Madras)Ltd

Madras HC26 Jun 2023AS/230/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This appeal filed under Section 96 CPC was disposed of on a Joint Memo of Compromise dated 08.06.2023 signed by all parties. The Court recorded the compromise, made it part of the decree, and permitted withdrawal of court deposit.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is disposed of; the Joint Memo of Compromise forms part of the decree; appellants can withdraw court deposit.

N.Shyamala Vs M/S.Suriyan Benefit… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

1/8

¶2

A.S.No.230/2021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶4

DATED :: 26-06-2023

¶5

CORAM

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

¶7

AND

¶8

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

¶9

A.S.No.230 of 2021

¶10

1.N.Shyamala 2.N.Venkatesh 3.N.Mahesh 4.N.Durga 5.N.Suresh ... Appellants

¶11

-vs-

¶12

M/s.Suriyan Benefit Fund (Madras) Ltd.... Respondent

¶13

Appeal is filed under under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree, dated 09.01.2020, passed in O.S.No.7453 of 2019, on the file of VI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.

¶14

For Appellants : Mr.T.S.Baskaran

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.E.Senthilkumar

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2/8

A.S.No.230/2021

JUDGMENT

(By S.Vaidyanathan,J .)

¶21

Learned counsel for the appellants and the respondent have filed a Joint

¶22

Memo of Compromise, dated 08.06.2023, entered into between the parties, duly signed

¶23

by them and their counsel, requesting for disposing of this Appeal Suit in terms of the said Memo.

¶24

All the parties are present before the Court today and they agreed that

¶25

they have arrived at a compromise and duly signed the Joint Memo of Compromise, which is scanned below :

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

3/8

¶28

A.S.No.230/2021

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

4/8

¶31

A.S.No.230/2021

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

5/8

¶34

A.S.No.230/2021

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

6/8

¶37

A.S.No.230/2021

¶38

Recording the said Joint Memo of Compromise, dated 08.06.2023, this Appeal Suit is disposed of. Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part of the decree. No costs.

¶39

As it is reported that the connected Second Appeals have also been settled out of Court, it is open for the parties to produce a copy of this judgment and the Joint Memo of Compromise before the learned single Judge to pass appropriate orders.

¶40

In terms of Clause 4 of the Joint Memo of Compromise, the appellants

¶41

are entitled to file a Memo before the Civil Court to withdraw the amount lying in Court Deposit together with interest accrued, if any, in which event, the amount shall be released to the appellants forthwith, preferably within 15 working days, subject to proof of deposit of the same.

¶42

Since the parties have arrived at a compromise and settled the matter out of Court, the appellants are entitled for refund of Court Fee as per Rules.

¶43

dixit

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

7/8

A.S.No.230/2021

1.V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

¶49

2.VI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

8/8

¶52

A.S.No.230/2021

¶53

S.VAIDYANATHAN, J. AND K.RAJASEKAR, J.

dixit

A.S.No.230 of 2021

26-06-2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

N.Shyamala v. M/S.Suriyan Benefit Fund(Madras)Ltd

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Shyamala v. M/S.Suriyan Benefit Fund(Madras)Ltd

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amudha Vs Muthu Chezhian

K. Manoharan Vs Cosmos Co-Operative Bank Ltd.

M/S.Royal Educational Trust, Vs the Authorized Officer

J.Kadarbasha Vs the Tamilnadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.

V.Ganeshwaran Vs a.M.Ismath

The Superintending Engineer Vs P.Mahalingam (Died)