S.Ravikumar, v. G.Deepa
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed an appeal against the trial court's order which dismissed a suit for recovery based on a disputed promissory note. Due to lack of proof regarding execution and consideration, the appeal failed.
What did the court decide?
The appeal suit was dismissed, and there were no orders as to costs.
What the court decided
A.S.No.1126 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Judgment Reserved on : 09.06.2023
Judgment Pronounced on : 14.06.2023
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
A.S.No.1126 of 2015 & M.P.No.1 of 2015
S.Ravikumar ... Appellant
Versus
1.G.Deepa
2.Minor Sridhar, S/o. Late Ganesan, Rep.by next friend mother and guardian G.Deepa, W/o. Late Ganesan. ... Respondents
Prayer : Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the Judgment and Decree dated of the Learned I- Additional District Judge, Salem, dated 25.08.2015 made in O.S.No.202 of 2014.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the suit promissory note is true and supported by valid consideration?
Whether the additional documents produced by the appellant should be taken on file?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S.Ravikumar
- respondent
G.Deepa
- respondent
Minor Sridhar, Rep.by G.Deepa
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court