This court allowed an application for leave to sue. The applicant, seeking leave to institute a civil suit for declaration of title and injunction, satisfied the court that the cause of action arose within its jurisdiction, despite the defendant residing outside.
Leave to the applicant to sue the respondent granted. Registry directed to number the suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.820 of 2023
A.No.820 of 2023 in C.S.No.D14224 of 2023
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
In a proposed suit for declaration of title to an immovable property and for injunctive relief in relation thereto, the intending plaintiff has presented this application for leave to sue the defendant before this Court.
13.02.2023
rna
1/2
A.No.820 of 2023
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
rna
A.No.820 of 2023 in C.S.No.D14224 of 2023
13.02.2023
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court has jurisdiction to grant leave to sue where the intended cause of action arose within its territory.
Applicant
Respondent
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
