Allowed
Vimalraj v. Pushparani, and Another
Madras HCA/6759/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The single judge allowed an application to condone a 53-day delay in filing a written statement, noting the respondents/plaintiffs had no objection.
What did the court decide?
Application to condone 53-day delay in filing written statement allowed; suit posted for framing issues.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
A.No.6759 of 2023
¶2
in
¶3
C.S.No.151 of 2023
¶4
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
¶5
This application has been filed to condone the delay of 53 days in filing the written statement by the applicant/ defendant.
¶6
- The learned counsel appearing for the respondents/ plaintiffs have no objection in allowing this application.
¶7
- Considering the nature of dispute between the parties and as the respondent/plaintiff has no objection in allowing this application, this application Ordered.
¶8
Post the suit on 10.01.2023 for framing issues along with T.O.S.No.22 of 2023.
¶9
21.12.2023
¶10
vrc
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the delay of 53 days in filing the written statement should be condoned?
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court